PDA

View Full Version : MoM Awards - Rnd 37 - Queen of the South (h)


Radford 72
19-04-2009, 06:07 PM
Vote for your man of the match. Hopefully most folk were able to see the match in TV, if not in person.

jez1971
19-04-2009, 06:10 PM
Homer simply for providing a threat when he came on.

sjfc.spl.09-10
19-04-2009, 06:10 PM
holmes and he scored both

perth_saintee12
19-04-2009, 06:13 PM
holmes and he scored both

Didnt Miller get the second?

sjfc.spl.09-10
19-04-2009, 06:23 PM
.

87 minutes - GOAL ST JOHNSTONE - It's Holmer again!! The ball come fizzing in from the right and Holmes diverts it high into the net - 2-2!

Saints website?

saintj
19-04-2009, 06:49 PM
since when does the ball bouncing off your head make someone man of the match?

St Mikey
19-04-2009, 06:52 PM
Ando for me.

2 assists and constantly away from the defense. Brilliant.

templeofsaints
19-04-2009, 07:06 PM
Sammy for me. Ran his arse off. Credit to Sheerin and Irvine for good performances and Millar and Mooner for doing well off the bench.

Calypso Kid
19-04-2009, 07:08 PM
since when does the ball bouncing off your head make someone man of the match?

Especially when it wasn't even his head!!


I went for Sheerin. Looking at the list there I couldn't see anyone else who put in s stronger performance. He continues to impress me with each week, top guy.

patsy
19-04-2009, 07:10 PM
since when does the ball bouncing off your head make someone man of the match?

you really are a tart

saintj
19-04-2009, 07:11 PM
you really are a tart
hahaha, a tart? how do you come to that conclusion?

saintj
19-04-2009, 07:12 PM
Especially when it wasn't even his head!!


I went for Sheerin. Looking at the list there I couldn't see anyone else who put in s stronger performance. He continues to impress me with each week, top guy.
there you go patsy, didnt even bounce off his head :)

patsy
19-04-2009, 07:14 PM
there you go patsy, didnt even bounce off his head :)

he scored one of the goals. one more than sammy did and he played the whole game

The ghost of Jim Morton
19-04-2009, 07:15 PM
I'm going for nobody this week. I felt as a team we were poor and none of the players did anything worthy of a MoM award.:sad: ..well maybe I'll go for Homer. The guys not a footballer but hey at least he scored:)

bleacher
19-04-2009, 07:19 PM
Went for Samuel - he looked dangerous every time he had the ball at his feet. Holmes did well too and that's the best way to use him, as an impact sub to change the game.

Calypso Kid
19-04-2009, 07:19 PM
I'm going for nobody this week. I felt as a team we were poor and none of the players did anything worthy of a MoM award.:sad: ..well maybe I'll go for Homer. The guys not a footballer but hey at least he scored:)

Homer did what was needed of him today. I don't think you can ask for more than that. If his style of play is over-used by the management it's hardly his fault, and the stick he gets for it is OTT.

The ghost of Jim Morton
19-04-2009, 07:20 PM
Homer did what was needed of him today. I don't think you can ask for more than that. If his style of play is over-used by the management it's hardly his fault, and the stick he gets for it is OTT.

Agreed.. I voted for him

saintj
19-04-2009, 07:21 PM
Homer did what was needed of him today. I don't think you can ask for more than that. If his style of play is over-used by the management it's hardly his fault, and the stick he gets for it is OTT.
im not giving homer stick for the way we play at times, thats down to the manager

Saline Saint
19-04-2009, 07:23 PM
Sammy for me,put in a shift for once although lucky not to be booked for his dive in the box.

patsy
19-04-2009, 07:35 PM
Homer!!!!!!!

Soberix
19-04-2009, 07:40 PM
Has to be Samuell for me today. The only player who felt like he was going to give the game a creative spark even if it didn't come.

Pretty dissapointed we didn't get the win to be honest. Plenty of chances, moons blaze over the bar, hardies scuff in the box and we had a good few corners plus the utterly legit goal that got clocked off.

SaintSam1884
19-04-2009, 07:40 PM
Ando for me.

2 assists and constantly away from the defense. Brilliant.

I'm not sure you can blame Anderson solely for the third goal. However, he was completely at fault for the second. I don't think anyone played well today, really. If I was choosing someone, it would be for the sake of it. Not because anyone was at all inspiring or stood out from the rest.

Cagey
19-04-2009, 07:41 PM
Sheerin for me. He is the oldest outfield player on the park but covered more of the park than anyone along with trying to play football when all around him were unable control the ball.

Jags Ya Bas!
19-04-2009, 07:42 PM
If I was choosing someone, it would be for the sake of it.
Swankie then, because he has nice hair. :wink:

MUZZ
19-04-2009, 07:43 PM
I'm not sure you can blame Anderson solely for the third goal. However, he was completely at fault for the second. I don't think anyone played well today, really. If I was choosing someone, it would be for the sake of it. Not because anyone was at all inspiring or stood out from the rest.

you are as uninspired as me by this squad. glad to see i ain't the only one.

Mike180279
19-04-2009, 07:44 PM
Sheerin, in a game of no standouts. good touches didnt do much wrong.

SJFC1988,
19-04-2009, 07:45 PM
dobbie

SaintSam1884
19-04-2009, 07:52 PM
you are as uninspired as me by this squad. glad to see i ain't the only one.

When I look at our squad, I can see that it is full of good players but they are not playing the kind of football that they are capable of and the level of inconsistency is unacceptable. You never know which Saints you are going to see, and that is not indicative of a title winning side to me.

Of course everyone will be happy if we win the title, but at the same time it is a little worrying that we have a squad of players who can't string two decent performances together causing their manager to have to make wholesale changes either before or during matches. Or is it the changes that cause the inconsistency? It's difficult to tell, it really is. There is a level of inconsistency both to the tactics and the performances.

Queens are effectively a one man team.

bankfootsaintee
19-04-2009, 07:56 PM
I'm not sure you can blame Anderson solely for the third goal. However, he was completely at fault for the second. I don't think anyone played well today, really. If I was choosing someone, it would be for the sake of it. Not because anyone was at all inspiring or stood out from the rest.

Agreed for the third Ruti went up the pitch, hit a thinned pass, Savo back heeled to keep it in, QOS player cleared it up pitch and striker was left on his own to do the necessary. I feel sorry for Ando as in the first half he was asked to play left back and is not a left back, and Garters insisted on putting him under pressure by passing slack balls to him.

Thought Sammy was the real positive player today.

SaintSam1884
19-04-2009, 08:01 PM
Agreed for the third Ruti went up the pitch, hit a thinned pass, Savo back heeled to keep it in, QOS player cleared it up pitch and striker was left on his own to do the necessary. I feel sorry for Ando as in the first half he was asked to play left back and is not a left back, and Garters insisted on putting him under pressure by passing slack balls to him.

Thought Sammy was the real positive player today.

We were chasing a winner and in doing so left ourselves horribly exposed. It was a risk and one which I suppose we had to take but that would have been the kind of draw I'd have been happy to see. That would've been a point won, unlike so many of the two points dropped affairs we've had to endure.

Dr Christmas Jones
19-04-2009, 08:42 PM
Homer simply because thomson had a very easy game up until he came on.Maybe did nt win every ball but put the whole qos defense under pressure.Its ok to say three or four players played ok but the game changed with homers header.fact.Although i would nt start him next week.If you can understand that.Horses for courses.

Dave H
19-04-2009, 09:05 PM
Holmes deserves a start next week after his desire this afternoon, we should drop Milne. Play Homler and Sammie next week v the Dee.

Feel for Ando, had the worst game of his life today! His performance today wouldnt have looked out of place in the Sunday morning pub league standard. Chin up though, you need to pay the fans back for your errors!

O'Rourke
19-04-2009, 09:09 PM
When you see what he does when he comes off the bench he is the unlikeliest but nevertheless very effective "impact" player just because he offers something different when a defence has settled into a game.

pavel
19-04-2009, 09:13 PM
Who voted for Gartland?! WTF!
Donkey!

StDuncM
19-04-2009, 09:18 PM
.

87 minutes - GOAL ST JOHNSTONE - It's Holmer again!! The ball come fizzing in from the right and Holmes diverts it high into the net - 2-2!

Saints website?

Update from the official site gives it to Thompson and watching on Alba it was an og for the aforementioned after seeing replays a couple of times

''The ball came fizzing in from the right and although Holmes challenged for it, it was Queens defender Jim Thomson who headed past his own keeper - 2-2!''

The game changed with the double sub and I think Holmes did enough tfor me to shade MOM, but Sheerin did ok as well.

StDuncM
19-04-2009, 09:21 PM
Who voted for Gartland?! WTF!
Donkey!

Jags on the wind up!

Cagey
19-04-2009, 09:22 PM
Ban him just like Webby.

Carse of Gowrie Saint
19-04-2009, 09:57 PM
Sheerin was the only player who actually played to their potential today out of the starting 11.

Finners
19-04-2009, 10:24 PM
sammy for me - always looked dangerous today.

sjfcsean
19-04-2009, 10:27 PM
Sheerin for me. He played well and kept the ball down all day without panic.

SanginSaint
19-04-2009, 10:27 PM
sheerin 4 skill sammy for graft

slf
19-04-2009, 10:51 PM
sorry

soulfulsaint
20-04-2009, 09:49 AM
Sheerin for me. He played well and kept the ball down all day without panic.

I know this is a cliche but Sheerin for me too.