thecat

#37 - 27/03/10 - Hamilton Accies 1-0 Saints - SPL

244 posts in this topic

Celtic 5-2 Saints (Samuel)

Hibs 3-0 Saints (Samuel)

Saints 1-2 Rangers (Samuel)

Killie 2-1 Saints (Samuel)

Rangers 3-0 Saints (Johansson)

Rangers 2-0 Saints (Sheridan)

Saints 1-1 Falkirk (Sheridan)

Hamilton 1-0 Saints (Deuchar)

Played 8, Won 0, Drawn 1, Lost 7, For 5, Against 19

Derek McInnes click here

101 Saint knows more about tactics than you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
a total plonker who just thot he would take his rage out by argueing with a loyal saints fan, thank goodness a pushed that idiot away for he was just jabbering on about godless mcinnes pish! none of these idiots at the game next week pleaseeeeeee!

Hmmm, an idiot who defends McInnes in every situation....

meh, that was gash. accies deserved their win.

met a 'soul destroyed looking' 101 saint today.

It's known as Delaffected. It's from the Craggy Island word, "fecked", meaning broken or useless, i.e Del fecked it again

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Celtic 5-2 Saints (Samuel)

Hibs 3-0 Saints (Samuel)

Saints 1-2 Rangers (Samuel)

Killie 2-1 Saints (Samuel)

Rangers 3-0 Saints (Johansson)

Rangers 2-0 Saints (Sheridan)

Saints 1-1 Falkirk (Sheridan)

Hamilton 1-0 Saints (Deuchar)

Played 8, Won 0, Drawn 1, Lost 7, For 5, Against 19

Thanks Radders. Knew would let us know.Stats speak volumes to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Celtic 5-2 Saints (Samuel)

Hibs 3-0 Saints (Samuel)

Saints 1-2 Rangers (Samuel)

Killie 2-1 Saints (Samuel)

Rangers 3-0 Saints (Johansson)

Rangers 2-0 Saints (Sheridan)

Saints 1-1 Falkirk (Sheridan)

Hamilton 1-0 Saints (Deuchar)

Played 8, Won 0, Drawn 1, Lost 7, For 5, Against 19

You missed the dundee utd away game. 3-3 I think it was.

Playing a 4-4-2 can very easily turn into a 5 in modfield if your striker comes back hunting for the ball, like wise the 4-1-4-1 that we have been playing more or less end up as 4-1-2-3 if your wide push on like Craig and Morais do.

It's not the tactics or formations that win or lose games its the players on the park, yet again we are all getting hung up on the formation when in effect the players did not perform, Simples!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You missed the dundee utd away game. 3-3 I think it was.

Playing a 4-4-2 can very easily turn into a 5 in modfield if your striker comes back hunting for the ball, like wise the 4-1-4-1 that we have been playing more or less end up as 4-1-2-3 if your wide push on like Craig and Morais do.

It's not the tactics or formations that win or lose games its the players on the park, yet again we are all getting hung up on the formation when in effect the players did not perform, Simples!!

Yes MS but the players we have can`t play the system as the stats prove. 4.4.2 suits the players we have. Happen to think 3.5.2 may work but we have never had 3 fit centre backs at any one time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes MS but the players we have can`t play the system as the stats prove. 4.4.2 suits the players we have. Happen to think 3.5.2 may work but we have never had 3 fit centre backs at any one time.

everyone says we dont hav the players-have we ever tried Fil Sammy Swanks?

im a good old fashioned 442 man but if we did try 433 thats a forward line i'd like to see

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
everyone says we dont hav the players-have we ever tried Fil Sammy Swanks?

im a good old fashioned 442 man but if we did try 433 thats a forward line i'd like to see

its the way forth imo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Celtic 5-2 Saints (Samuel)

Hibs 3-0 Saints (Samuel)

Saints 1-2 Rangers (Samuel)

Killie 2-1 Saints (Samuel)

Rangers 3-0 Saints (Johansson)

Rangers 2-0 Saints (Sheridan)

Saints 1-1 Falkirk (Sheridan)

Hamilton 1-0 Saints (Deuchar)

Played 8, Won 0, Drawn 1, Lost 7, For 5, Against 19

Saints 1-0 Aberdeen (Sheridan)

:wink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
everyone says we dont hav the players-have we ever tried Fil Sammy Swanks?

im a good old fashioned 442 man but if we did try 433 thats a forward line i'd like to see

And then what? Play tight with 3 in the middle? Its been well documented that Irvine has been below par recently and that Grainger is no stalwart, so leaving them 1v1 at the back is asking for trouble. Playing 4-3-3 in my opinion leaves us open to being criminally broke down. And I doubt Swankie and Morais would be willing to do lengths of the pitch all day to help them out.

I will admit to favouring the 4-3-3 back in Div 1, that was when Irvine was playing outstanding and Stanic was on the other side and playing Peaso out wide gave us an ariel threat against the wing-backs, can you imagine Swankie in a 50/50 against Papac? Doesny bear thinking about

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would like to see a 4-3-3 with Morris, Midge and Morais in the middle and Peaso, Sammy and Doc up front. Not against Rangers though. Against a team we might actually pump.

Heres hoping for Raith Rovers in the cup next year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Would like to see a 4-3-3 with Morris, Midge and Morais in the middle and Peaso, Sammy and Doc up front. Not against Rangers though. Against a team we might actually pump.

Heres hoping for Raith Rovers in the cup next year.

Thats what Dundee said

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Apologies, just checked.

Sorry Radders, didn't mean to doubt you!

Takes a big man to apologise. Now, did Liam hit goal number 10 last night?:laugh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now