David123

Player Contracts + Transfers

Recommended Posts

Twitter and Express saying it is Vigurs Lomas wants on pre contract.

he was a wee s***e in the last game but thought he was maybe their best player on the day

Cant be bothered looking it up, but have a feeling that he scores a few goals from midfield....that we do need

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jamie Adams is out for the rest of the season. If his deal is up then it is hard to see it getting renewed

What a waste of a wage he's been this season. No chance he'll get an extension now if that's the case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What a waste of a wage he's been this season. No chance he'll get an extension now if that's the case.

His style of play suggests he takes as many knocks as he gives. Call it injury prone or whatever, but the time will be right to release him when his contract expires.

Sorry Jamie.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

His style of play suggests he takes as many knocks as he gives. Call it injury prone or whatever, but the time will be right to release him when his contract expires.

Sorry Jamie.

Could be a totally brand new midfield next season. Might be an interesting summer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely criminal that a team of Saints' relative size are about to let our most valuable player of the last 15 year's to leave for free, with no future benefits from his career. With a bit of foresight any chairman would have known that 23-25 is the prime age for a developing young footballer to make his big move. He should have been signed on a 5 year deal when we had the chance. I don't care what anyone says about risk, and financial climate and all that rubbish. The worst Murray Davidson was ever going to achieve in his career was a captain of a top six SPL side. Where is the risk? Every single scout, coach and manager who has ever come across Murray has stated he can make it all the way to the very top. And I can tell you for a fact that at least one of England's traditional 'big five' have been to see Murray and knowing the Scottish connection at Liverpool and Man Utd I wouldn't be at all surprised if they have in his younger days aswell.

Although Murray had improved saints and we have been blessed with his presence, financially we have not achieved very much. No cup finals, one European match. No top three finish, no cup finals and no transfer and no future sell on/international appearance fees.

At least Goodwillie at United signed one more deal out of loyalty so the club could cash in.

I don't blame Murray at all, more poor foresight.

Edited by R.B.B:- Adz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely criminal that a team of Saints' relative size are about to let our most valuable player of the last 15 year's to leave for free, with no future benefits from his career. With a bit of foresight any chairman would have known that 23-25 is the prime age for a developing young footballer to make his big move. He should have been signed on a 5 year deal when we had the chance. I don't care what anyone says about risk, and financial climate and all that rubbish. The worst Murray Davidson was ever going to achieve in his career was a captain of a top six SPL side. Where is the risk? Every single scout, coach and manager who has ever come across Murray has stated he can make it all the way to the very top. And I can tell you for a fact that at least one of England's traditional 'big five' have been to see Murray and knowing the Scottish connection at Liverpool and Man Utd I wouldn't be at all surprised if they have in his younger days aswell.

Although Murray had improved saints and we have been blessed with his presence, financially we have not achieved very much. No cup finals, one European match. No top three finish, no cup finals and no transfer and no future sell on/international appearance fees.

At least Goodwillie at United signed one more deal out of loyalty so the club could cash in.

I don't blame Murray at all, more poor foresight.

But the Club have put a 2 year deal on the table for him.

If you were Murray would you have signed a 5 year contract 2 years ago? I would not have, He would have been silly to have done so from a financial point of view. He is now going to be in a position to sign for a club and command a favourable signing on fee.

Unless you bring a kid through the ranks and sell him pre 24 year old transfer fees are virtually a thing of the past.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So Blackpool a team run very tightly, that not so long ago offered Robbie Fowler just £50 a week to sign for them, are going to spend £1m on a player that is in the last six months of his contract. Saints would accept 200k in a flash let alone 1m.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Only if Euan McLean is part of the deal. And my information is McLean has no intention of leaving.

I've heard they also want to look at Sammy Yousseff to make the deal even more worth while for them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now