slf Posted April 8, 2019 Report Share Posted April 8, 2019 On 3/27/2019 at 9:12 AM, HOODLUM65 said: In a recent BBC survey/poll of the 42 senior clubs on "Strict Liability" only 3 clubs wanted it, those being Q-of-S., Annan & Partick. 14 clubs said they would vote against, including Saints. 17 clubs said they were unwilling to comment. 8 clubs failed to respond , among those were Celtic , Hearts & Rangers. I would have thought stjohnstone would vote for. they played god and done a ‘strict liability ‘ with the young lads of the FCU.even though they never caused any bother inside mcdairmid.lost a whole generation of fans they did. just goes to show . bottling it from the rangers / Celtic as always. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garydavidson Posted April 9, 2019 Report Share Posted April 9, 2019 20 hours ago, slf said: I would have thought stjohnstone would vote for. they played god and done a ‘strict liability ‘ with the young lads of the FCU.even though they never caused any bother inside mcdairmid.lost a whole generation of fans they did. just goes to show . bottling it from the rangers / Celtic as always. Oh this one again, you know fine well they didn't. blueheaven 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sixties saintee Posted April 9, 2019 Report Share Posted April 9, 2019 Even the womens team put us to shame Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slf Posted April 9, 2019 Report Share Posted April 9, 2019 3 hours ago, garydavidson said: Oh this one again, you know fine well they didn't. Oh no I don’t Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garydavidson Posted April 10, 2019 Report Share Posted April 10, 2019 14 hours ago, slf said: Oh no I don’t Well do a search for the FCU thread and read it back when you are sober. The club never banned the group. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slf Posted April 10, 2019 Report Share Posted April 10, 2019 5 hours ago, garydavidson said: Well do a search for the FCU thread and read it back when you are sober. The club never banned the group. Never said they were banned.read my post when yer sober. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garydavidson Posted April 10, 2019 Report Share Posted April 10, 2019 2 hours ago, slf said: Never said they were banned.read my post when yer sober. What are you claiming the club did? It reads as if the club banished all of them for the actions of a few which was not the case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slf Posted April 10, 2019 Report Share Posted April 10, 2019 5 hours ago, garydavidson said: What are you claiming the club did? It reads as if the club banished all of them for the actions of a few which was not the case. Read ma post . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garydavidson Posted April 10, 2019 Report Share Posted April 10, 2019 1 hour ago, slf said: Read ma post . I have. The club banned four individuals for their unacceptable behaviour at an away fixture. The rest of fcu then decided to disband and not back the team. No strict liability occuring. Are you suggesting the home team that day should have dealt with it? blueheaven 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sixties saintee Posted April 20, 2019 Report Share Posted April 20, 2019 Mc Innes and Docherty charged by the Spfl, they said earlier clubs had done all they could to stamp out sectarianism Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sixties saintee Posted April 22, 2019 Report Share Posted April 22, 2019 Malky McKay as temp boss just when you thought it couldnt get any worse. HOODLUM65 and south inch 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cagey Posted April 23, 2019 Report Share Posted April 23, 2019 18 hours ago, sixties saintee said: Malky McKay as temp boss just when you thought it couldnt get any worse. That was predictable & just shows how utterly useless this bunch are. He has been in charge of Project Brave for ages & things have got worse. Did they appoint him because he was in the building ?. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOODLUM65 Posted April 29, 2019 Report Share Posted April 29, 2019 He drove his 2cv into the building. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOODLUM65 Posted May 1, 2019 Report Share Posted May 1, 2019 Septic fans upset at appointment of John Beaton ( who took no action for 3 incidents involving Morelos against Septic when Sevco won 1-0 ), for their potential league winning game against the Sheep. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sixties saintee Posted May 3, 2019 Report Share Posted May 3, 2019 7.5 k fine for auld squirm Spfl had the chance to hammer them both and make a statement of intent, like Eufa both full o shite. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garydavidson Posted May 3, 2019 Report Share Posted May 3, 2019 1 hour ago, sixties saintee said: 7.5 k fine for auld squirm Spfl had the chance to hammer them both and make a statement of intent, like Eufa both full o shite. I think the SFA only needed the £15,000 to fix some plumbing at Hampden or for a summer staff night out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.