Mike180279 Posted August 25, 2009 Report Share Posted August 25, 2009 Everyone that was at Parkhead (or Sellick park as its now called) would agree that they were worse than usual. Surely we should be looking to adopt a more continental style slow build from the back? We were playing right into Celtic hands on Saturday by giving them the ball straight back. Thoughts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ancientsaint Posted August 25, 2009 Report Share Posted August 25, 2009 I dont think Alan had his mind on this game-didnt look interested -but that was my view. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Posted August 25, 2009 Report Share Posted August 25, 2009 Everyone that was at Parkhead (or Sellick park as its now called) would agree that they were worse than usual I bet Gary Caldwell thinks so :laugh: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE LARK SAINT Posted August 25, 2009 Report Share Posted August 25, 2009 Everyone that was at Parkhead (or Sellick park as its now called) would agree that they were worse than usual. Surely we should be looking to adopt a more continental style slow build from the back? We were playing right into Celtic hands on Saturday by giving them the ball straight back. Thoughts? Did we not score from one of his kicks then???? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike180279 Posted August 25, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 25, 2009 Yeah, we did. Ok, maybe he hit one into the park. Out of how many? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
O'Rourke Posted August 25, 2009 Report Share Posted August 25, 2009 Surely we should be looking to adopt a more continental style slow build from the back? Motherwell played the ball comfortably from the back. That stlye may suit some but perhaps not Messrs Gartland and Rustybits. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john1962 Posted August 25, 2009 Report Share Posted August 25, 2009 I think he was aiming for McKay so not much margin for error. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ancientsaint Posted August 25, 2009 Report Share Posted August 25, 2009 I think he was aiming for McKay so not much margin for error. be a good money spinner.......picture of Alan kicking the ball......blank it out ...then ask folk to guess where it lands Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john1962 Posted August 25, 2009 Report Share Posted August 25, 2009 be a good money spinner.......picture of Alan kicking the ball......blank it out ...then ask folk to guess where it lands Row D would be my guess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
101 Saint Posted August 25, 2009 Report Share Posted August 25, 2009 I think he was aiming for McKay so not much margin for error. And Mackay's total inability to time a jump made Alzo's kicking appear worse than it was. His kicking was jolly good on Saturday. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
101 Saint Posted August 25, 2009 Report Share Posted August 25, 2009 I dont think Alan had his mind on this game-didnt look interested -but that was my view. He certainly lost interest when we conceded the third. I have no real problem with that. It must have been embarassing for him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saintkev Posted August 25, 2009 Report Share Posted August 25, 2009 I didn't notice it being any different from usual!?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ancientsaint Posted August 25, 2009 Report Share Posted August 25, 2009 I didn't notice it being any different from usual!?! Thats because you were "welcoming" people from Perth dressed in differing attire !! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobby kemp Posted August 25, 2009 Report Share Posted August 25, 2009 He certainly lost interest when we conceded the third. I have no real problem with that. It must have been embarassing for him. Now i know your not DEL in disguise as you surely wouldnt accept your G/K loosing intrest withover half an hour to play. would you ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
101 Saint Posted August 25, 2009 Report Share Posted August 25, 2009 Now i know your not DEL in disguise as you surely wouldnt accept your G/K loosing intrest withover half an hour to play. would you ? Human nature, son. When they got their third the game was over. The rest was torture. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobby kemp Posted August 25, 2009 Report Share Posted August 25, 2009 Human nature, son. When they got their third the game was over. The rest was torture. not in my book DAD, not when he is getting paid thousands per week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
101 Saint Posted August 25, 2009 Report Share Posted August 25, 2009 not in my book DAD, not when he is getting paid thousands per week. Totally irrelevant. He was being humiliated in public by a synergy of ineptitude. Money doesn't come into it. Your interpretation of his salary is misleading. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Inspiration Posted August 25, 2009 Report Share Posted August 25, 2009 Thats because you were "welcoming" people from Perth dressed in differing attire !! with hi-vis vests on if im not mistaken? looked like that anyway Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saintkev Posted August 25, 2009 Report Share Posted August 25, 2009 Thats because you were "welcoming" people from Perth dressed in differing attire !! Nah, I paid enough attention to the game... thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobby kemp Posted August 25, 2009 Report Share Posted August 25, 2009 (edited) Totally irrelevant. He was being humiliated in public by a synergy of ineptitude. Money doesn't come into it. Your interpretation of his salary is misleading. How is it irrelevant? if your not playing for the club and the fans at least play for the wages you are picking up . if you accept that well thank feck you are NOT the manager. btw i am not accusing main of chucking it ,i am answering the post with my views on it. Edited August 25, 2009 by bobby kemp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
101 Saint Posted August 25, 2009 Report Share Posted August 25, 2009 How is it irrelevant? if your not playing for the club and the fans at least play for the wages you are picking up . if you accept that well thank feck you are NOT the manager. btw i am not accusing main of chucking it ,i am answering the post with my views on it. Because I don't want a player who's motivated by money, I want one who's driven to win and dominated bt pride. Alzo is both. Your point about money is irrelevant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobby kemp Posted August 25, 2009 Report Share Posted August 25, 2009 Because I don't want a player who's motivated by money, I want one who's driven to win and dominated bt pride. Alzo is both. Your point about money is irrelevant. i never said he wasnt. the money point i am afraid is relevant, if you were paying some one really good money to work for you and he lost interest at lunchtime would you keep him?, i think not. so my piont about money IS relevant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
101 Saint Posted August 25, 2009 Report Share Posted August 25, 2009 i never said he wasnt. the money point i am afraid is relevant, if you were paying some one really good money to work for you and he lost interest at lunchtime would you keep him?, i think not. so my piont about money IS relevant. Did he cause us to lose? No Did he cost us a goal? No Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobby kemp Posted August 25, 2009 Report Share Posted August 25, 2009 He certainly lost interest when we conceded the third. I have no real problem with that. It must have been embarassing for him. thats correct at least you got something right. my comments were about you having no problem with him loosing interest with half hour to go which to me wasnt acceptable , not did he cause a goal or cause us to loose. said enough about this am off to bed, enjoy! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SingaporeSaint Posted August 26, 2009 Report Share Posted August 26, 2009 I presume our "veteran" goalkeeper has given up at improving his kicking and just sticks to what he does best. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.