#37 - 27/03/10 - Hamilton Accies 1-0 Saints - SPL

[101 Saint]

Celtic 5-2 Saints (Samuel)

Hibs 3-0 Saints (Samuel)

Saints 1-2 Rangers (Samuel)

Killie 2-1 Saints (Samuel)

Rangers 3-0 Saints (Johansson)

Rangers 2-0 Saints (Sheridan)

Saints 1-1 Falkirk (Sheridan)

Hamilton 1-0 Saints (Deuchar)

Played 8, Won 0, Drawn 1, Lost 7, For 5, Against 19

Derek McInnes click here

101 Saint knows more about tactics than you.

[101 Saint]

a total plonker who just thot he would take his rage out by argueing with a loyal saints fan, thank goodness a pushed that idiot away for he was just jabbering on about godless mcinnes pish! none of these idiots at the game next week pleaseeeeeee!

Hmmm, an idiot who defends McInnes in every situation....

meh, that was gash. accies deserved their win.

met a 'soul destroyed looking' 101 saint today.

It's known as Delaffected. It's from the Craggy Island word, "fecked", meaning broken or useless, i.e Del fecked it again

[Cagey]

Celtic 5-2 Saints (Samuel)

Hibs 3-0 Saints (Samuel)

Saints 1-2 Rangers (Samuel)

Killie 2-1 Saints (Samuel)

Rangers 3-0 Saints (Johansson)

Rangers 2-0 Saints (Sheridan)

Saints 1-1 Falkirk (Sheridan)

Hamilton 1-0 Saints (Deuchar)

Played 8, Won 0, Drawn 1, Lost 7, For 5, Against 19

Thanks Radders. Knew would let us know.Stats speak volumes to me.

[mainstand]

Celtic 5-2 Saints (Samuel)

Hibs 3-0 Saints (Samuel)

Saints 1-2 Rangers (Samuel)

Killie 2-1 Saints (Samuel)

Rangers 3-0 Saints (Johansson)

Rangers 2-0 Saints (Sheridan)

Saints 1-1 Falkirk (Sheridan)

Hamilton 1-0 Saints (Deuchar)

Played 8, Won 0, Drawn 1, Lost 7, For 5, Against 19

You missed the dundee utd away game. 3-3 I think it was.

Playing a 4-4-2 can very easily turn into a 5 in modfield if your striker comes back hunting for the ball, like wise the 4-1-4-1 that we have been playing more or less end up as 4-1-2-3 if your wide push on like Craig and Morais do.

It's not the tactics or formations that win or lose games its the players on the park, yet again we are all getting hung up on the formation when in effect the players did not perform, Simples!!

[Cagey]

You missed the dundee utd away game. 3-3 I think it was.

Playing a 4-4-2 can very easily turn into a 5 in modfield if your striker comes back hunting for the ball, like wise the 4-1-4-1 that we have been playing more or less end up as 4-1-2-3 if your wide push on like Craig and Morais do.

It's not the tactics or formations that win or lose games its the players on the park, yet again we are all getting hung up on the formation when in effect the players did not perform, Simples!!

Yes MS but the players we have can`t play the system as the stats prove. 4.4.2 suits the players we have. Happen to think 3.5.2 may work but we have never had 3 fit centre backs at any one time.

[541ntees]

Yes MS but the players we have can`t play the system as the stats prove. 4.4.2 suits the players we have. Happen to think 3.5.2 may work but we have never had 3 fit centre backs at any one time.

everyone says we dont hav the players-have we ever tried Fil Sammy Swanks?

im a good old fashioned 442 man but if we did try 433 thats a forward line i'd like to see

[slf]

i miss fighting on the terraces

[Cagey]

i miss fighting on the terraces

Do you live in your own wee world SLF.

[SingaporeSaint]

Do you live in your own wee world SLF.

I think what slf is saying was that there was more "passion" on the terracing during the 70's and 80's.

[saintj]

everyone says we dont hav the players-have we ever tried Fil Sammy Swanks?

im a good old fashioned 442 man but if we did try 433 thats a forward line i'd like to see

its the way forth imo

[The Inspiration]

Celtic 5-2 Saints (Samuel)

Hibs 3-0 Saints (Samuel)

Saints 1-2 Rangers (Samuel)

Killie 2-1 Saints (Samuel)

Rangers 3-0 Saints (Johansson)

Rangers 2-0 Saints (Sheridan)

Saints 1-1 Falkirk (Sheridan)

Hamilton 1-0 Saints (Deuchar)

Played 8, Won 0, Drawn 1, Lost 7, For 5, Against 19

Saints 1-0 Aberdeen (Sheridan)

[C.Washington]

Saints 1-0 Aberdeen (Sheridan)

deuchar and sheridan were up front

[Bally]

everyone says we dont hav the players-have we ever tried Fil Sammy Swanks?

im a good old fashioned 442 man but if we did try 433 thats a forward line i'd like to see

And then what? Play tight with 3 in the middle? Its been well documented that Irvine has been below par recently and that Grainger is no stalwart, so leaving them 1v1 at the back is asking for trouble. Playing 4-3-3 in my opinion leaves us open to being criminally broke down. And I doubt Swankie and Morais would be willing to do lengths of the pitch all day to help them out.

I will admit to favouring the 4-3-3 back in Div 1, that was when Irvine was playing outstanding and Stanic was on the other side and playing Peaso out wide gave us an ariel threat against the wing-backs, can you imagine Swankie in a 50/50 against Papac? Doesny bear thinking about

[MCFrancis]

Would like to see a 4-3-3 with Morris, Midge and Morais in the middle and Peaso, Sammy and Doc up front. Not against Rangers though. Against a team we might actually pump.

Heres hoping for Raith Rovers in the cup next year.

[Scobby_SJFC]

Would like to see a 4-3-3 with Morris, Midge and Morais in the middle and Peaso, Sammy and Doc up front. Not against Rangers though. Against a team we might actually pump.

Heres hoping for Raith Rovers in the cup next year.

Thats what Dundee said

[Mike180279]

Thats what Dundee said

and aberdeen

[The Inspiration]

deuchar and sheridan were up front

Apologies, just checked.

Sorry Radders, didn't mean to doubt you!

[101 Saint]

Apologies, just checked.

Sorry Radders, didn't mean to doubt you!

Takes a big man to apologise. Now, did Liam hit goal number 10 last night?

[HOODLUM65]

£22 adults & £11 concessions. Five of us were going but now giving it a miss, football pricing itself out of business !

2013 PRICES £16 and £8.