What will you do if new Rangers are allowed straight into SPL?  

247 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

41 minutes ago, HOODLUM65 said:

Bears reported to be lining up a move for Oli McBurnie from Sheffield United for £15m.

Scored 1 goal in 22 appearances since his €20m move to the Blades.

Really what a waste of a shirt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, HOODLUM65 said:

Bears reported to be lining up a move for Oli McBurnie from Sheffield United for £15m.

Scored 1 goal in 22 appearances since his €20m move to the Blades.

Correction.-- should read " £20m move to Blades ".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, HOODLUM65 said:

Bears reported to be lining up a move for Oli McBurnie from Sheffield United for £15m.

Scored 1 goal in 22 appearances since his €20m move to the Blades.

Sheffield getting off lightly with a £5'mill loss.

Rangers wasting £15"mil they don't have.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Abernethy Saint said:

Reluctant to slag McBurnie because he gives 110% for Scotland, but isn’t he just shite? Hard to see what Gerrard and Clarke see in him. Most overrated striker of our time? 

Should fit in just fine at Ibrox!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, HOODLUM65 said:

Bears offering £6.75m shares issue to the knuckledraggers. 

Surely not going tits up again?

There are currently around 250 million Rangers* shares in circulation.  £6,75 m at 20 pence a share will add another 32 million.  Rangers* are most unlikely to pay a share dividend.  You can only trade  shares privately but the only interest is likely to come from people who might be interested in gaining influence in the club's affairs and they will only be interested if you own a large block of shares.  (Park owns 40 million)

So if you buy £1ks worth of shares, assuming they will sell you such a small quantity, you will receive a share certificate whose only value will be bragging rights with other knuckledraggers. 

Oh, and you can turn up at the AGM and shout abuse at the Board until you are thrown out!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, south inch said:

There are currently around 250 million Rangers* shares in circulation.  £6,75 m at 20 pence a share will add another 32 million.  Rangers* are most unlikely to pay a share dividend.  You can only trade  shares privately but the only interest is likely to come from people who might be interested in gaining influence in the club's affairs and they will only be interested if you own a large block of shares.  (Park owns 40 million)

So if you buy £1ks worth of shares, assuming they will sell you such a small quantity, you will receive a share certificate whose only value will be bragging rights with other knuckledraggers. 

Oh, and you can turn up at the AGM and shout abuse at the Board until you are thrown out!

Ah! Thought as much.

1 share is worth hee-haw..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Douglas Park says Rangers have been around for 150 years ha ha and this will insure we are around for another 150. No this money will dig you out of a hole for another year ,maybe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, Cagey said:

Douglas Park says Rangers have been around for 150 years ha ha and this will insure we are around for another 150. No this money will dig you out of a hole for another year ,maybe.

Sure I read cagey they need over 12 million going forward sure they called it working capital which usually means money to pay the wages

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Broggy Man said:

Sure I read cagey they need over 12 million going forward sure they called it working capital which usually means money to pay the wages

Yeah,I think it will be for wages. Wonder where they will get the £15 mil for McBurnie.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Cagey said:

Yeah,I think it will be for wages. Wonder where they will get the £15 mil for McBurnie.

Some sugar daddy no doubt or sell Morelos they seem to think he is worth a fortune

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rangers did two share issues in the first place at around 27p a go. They are now privately traded via JP Jenkins, alongside Millwall PLC for 19p a share IF the seller has 100s of 1000s to sell. Which leaves the average fan with a valueless paper stock...unlisted. 

Rangers are about to go bankrupt again, and yet we won't call it that because they'll tap up the fan base of thickos and thugs. 

RANGERS 
https://jpjenkins.com/company/rangers-international-football-club-plc/

Who they share a platform with

https://jpjenkins.com/companies/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We do refusing to promote cinch because it competes with Parks. Surely they can't get away with this. SFA should withhold their share of sponsor money if they don't comply. Either that or remote them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There will only be one winner in this and we all know who it will be. They are the culture, their arrogance is second to none, they run Scotland and Scottish football. They only abide to rules that suit themselves and, are ably supported by a compliant media.

Nobody can, nor will, do anything about it.

Time to move on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Indicator said:

There will only be one winner in this and we all know who it will be. They are the culture, their arrogance is second to none, they run Scotland and Scottish football. They only abide to rules that suit themselves and, are ably supported by a compliant media.

Nobody can, nor will, do anything about it.

Time to move on.

Obviously I agree fully with your assessment of their arrogance etc. but I don't think we can just move on.  Like all contracts with sponsors the main interest will be in the ugly sisters participation.  If the blue half dig their heels in Cinch may be able to walk away especially as the green half's mismanagement of their affairs makes them less attractive to sponsors with every tournament they crash out of!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Cagey said:

We do refusing to promote cinch because it competes with Parks. Surely they can't get away with this. SFA should withhold their share of sponsor money if they don't comply. Either that or remote them.

How did Sevco become We do ?.. Blody predictive text.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...