Jamie_Beatson Posted October 21, 2014 Report Share Posted October 21, 2014 Neither of the goals were keepers ball. At all. The first one was Anderson's and he flicked it straight to Magennis. The second was Graham's and he completely missed it allowing Magennis to nod home from the front post. Their keeper was awful at dealing with crosses-flapping at several and coming miles out for others that he didn't need to, leaving himself out of position. The difference was they were whipping the ball in flat and at pace, which makes it hard for the keeper while we were floating them in giving the keeper time to judge it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benito Kemble Posted October 21, 2014 Report Share Posted October 21, 2014 Just watched the highlights for the first time. Agree that the first goal definitely wan't Mannus' ball and Anderson could/should have done better - from where I was sitting it looked like Mannus could have got it. The second I don't think it was Graham's ball, it was too high for him. The lack of challenge on Magennis is admittedly more alarming than Mannus coming for crosses. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edstar101 Posted October 21, 2014 Report Share Posted October 21, 2014 Just watched the highlights for the first time. Agree that the first goal definitely wan't Mannus' ball and Anderson could/should have done better - from where I was sitting it looked like Mannus could have got it. The second I don't think it was Graham's ball, it was too high for him. The lack of challenge on Magennis is admittedly more alarming than Mannus coming for crosses. Reports suggest it was Muzz that let Magennis go Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broon Posted October 21, 2014 Report Share Posted October 21, 2014 2nd one the keeper has to take. Agree the first wasn't his ball - it was a mistake by Ando (he had a terrible afternoon). However, there were 2 other corners that we should have conceded that landed right in the 6 yard box within minutes of the goals and Mannus didn't come off his line. He doesn't give the defence any confidence at all with crosses. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ancientsaint Posted October 21, 2014 Report Share Posted October 21, 2014 Reports suggest it was Muzz that let Magennis go I thought it was Derek McInnes that let him go ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE LARK SAINT Posted October 21, 2014 Report Share Posted October 21, 2014 (edited) I thought it was Derek McInnes that let him go ! With gags like that you will rival Bruce Fumey!Who by the way is playing at the Saints Club on Friday in an event brought to you by weareperthbarossasaints to raise funds for Saints Youth Development. Tickets are £10 which includes Soup and Stovies.Tickets available on the door or by calling the Club on 628391(After 5pm) Edited October 21, 2014 by THE LARK SAINT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benito Kemble Posted October 21, 2014 Report Share Posted October 21, 2014 Yeah it was Davidson who was marking him at the 2nd goal, and Miller at the 1st. After Magennis scored the 1st (or even from the start of the game if proper preparation was done) they should have had 2 men on him at set pieces. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
541ntees Posted October 22, 2014 Report Share Posted October 22, 2014 Heard spencey on sportsound talking about killie not getting their bonuses n he said that 1 team pay 650 for a win and 300 for a draw. I'm presuming its 1 of the Tayside clubs. I'd be raging if saints players were on that for a draw Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cagey Posted October 22, 2014 Report Share Posted October 22, 2014 Heard spencey on sportsound talking about killie not getting their bonuses n he said that 1 team pay 650 for a win and 300 for a draw. I'm presuming its 1 of the Tayside clubs. I'd be raging if saints players were on that for a draw If they were on money like that I would hope we wouldn`t be in the position we are now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PerthSeany Posted October 22, 2014 Report Share Posted October 22, 2014 Heard spencey on sportsound talking about killie not getting their bonuses n he said that 1 team pay 650 for a win and 300 for a draw. I'm presuming its 1 of the Tayside clubs. I'd be raging if saints players were on that for a draw The problem with the Killie players is that previously they were on a monthly bonus... But it was changed to an annual bonus and the players either assumed or were lead to believe it was on the same or similar terms in terms of value of the bonus just paid at the end of the season instead of at the end of each month when it was agreed. But actually they had the wool was pulled over the eyes a bit and they are getting a lot less than of what they expected/were due for the bonus by the club. That's over £3500 for a draw per squad? Surely not? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broon Posted October 23, 2014 Report Share Posted October 23, 2014 Steve Brown will be delighted - imagine how much he's saved on Win bonuses this year? David123 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.