January 2025 Transfer Window


Northern saint

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, R.B.B:- Adz said:

I think you are correct to assume that Simo will try to utilise his contacts abroad but he will also be streetwise enough to know that players who have experience in this league should be part of the squad he builds.

I'm not so sure. I think we'll see players exclusively that he knows from Finland, Latvia and Norway for the first 2 transfer windows. I think this was one of his selling points in not competing with (& losing out on) the same players as Killie, Dundee and so on are trying to attract, but tapping in to a market that hasn't had much traction in the SPFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Linky said:

I'm not so sure. I think we'll see players exclusively that he knows from Finland, Latvia and Norway for the first 2 transfer windows. I think this was one of his selling points in not competing with (& losing out on) the same players as Killie, Dundee and so on are trying to attract, but tapping in to a market that hasn't had much traction in the SPFL.

If we are looking at players from abroad I hope we can get the request for visas in quick. Probably you can't apply until they are actually signed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, R.B.B:- Adz said:

If you think that’s a lot you’d fall off your chair if you knew how much shipping May and McGowan to Livi collectively saved us. Eye watering!!

I've heard this as well.

if you ever wanted to be a Saints player, the time to do so was three years ago.

You'd have been set for life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Linky said:

I imagine we’ll let Carey go, but offer Clark vastly reduced terms. Although might depend on how well Ikpeazu does 

Carey has had so much to deal with off the pitch. Fair play to him continuing in very challenging personal circumstances.   Against Kilmarnock he gave the ball away a few times and the first half today was also difficult for him. 

McPake has got to be up there in the most unusual of Saints signings. League Two bound in January surely?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Havana Saint said:

Carey has had so much to deal with off the pitch. Fair play to him continuing in very challenging personal circumstances.   Against Kilmarnock he gave the ball away a few times and the first half today was also difficult for him. 

McPake has got to be up there in the most unusual of Saints signings. League Two bound in January surely?

Levein had to be on LSD when he signed McPake, truely woeful

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As always budget and available targets will determine whether or not we can improve in January.  As a positive, Rae seems better with a semblance of a defence in front of him.  Does that rule out goalkeeper as the number one priority?  

Right back and a creative midfielder are the main areas for me.  Milo's twin would be a good option😁  Will some of the loan players leave?  Do we recall several of our loan players?  Will some of our younger players take the opportunity to impress if given the chance?  The old adage, "If you're good enough, you're old enough."  

At least we have some positivity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Northern saint said:

As always budget and available targets will determine whether or not we can improve in January.  As a positive, Rae seems better with a semblance of a defence in front of him.  Does that rule out goalkeeper as the number one priority?  

Right back and a creative midfielder are the main areas for me.  Milo's twin would be a good option😁  Will some of the loan players leave?  Do we recall several of our loan players?  Will some of our younger players take the opportunity to impress if given the chance?  The old adage, "If you're good enough, you're old enough."  

At least we have some positivity.

Not sure any of the young guys are ready but would have given Fran a run at right back.

Can't see any loaners being recalled but wouldn't mind seeing Taylor Steven bring recalled as we need width and pace and would be a good replacement for Carey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Havana Saint said:

I've no idea what salary he is on. We have him until 2026. He looked massively out his depth at the weekend. I think that's a concern. 

Out of his depth has to be the understatement of the year.

I know it was against Rangers, but he looks like a he’d struggle at League Two or Lowland League level.

He’ll be top of Simo’s list to get out on loan with view to making it permanent.

I suspect he will be on of those that we will look for in 2/3 years and be shocked to see how low down the leagues he is playing. 

Edited by R.B.B:- Adz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, R.B.B:- Adz said:

I know it was against Rangers, but he looks like a he’d struggle at League Two or Lowland League level.

By all accounts he did struggle at near enough that level last season!

The signing makes little sense, especially for two years, and being cheap is no excuse. No one is cheap if they can't do a job at our level - it's throwing money away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, garydavidson said:

By all accounts he did struggle at near enough that level last season!

The signing makes little sense, especially for two years, and being cheap is no excuse. No one is cheap if they can't do a job at our level - it's throwing money away.

Not sure about this. He was supposed to have great promise when he was at Rangers. Did really well on loan in the English League 2 and Scottish Championship and the thinking was that he lost his way a bit a Stirling, partly because he was without a club for 5 months before joining them.

I think quite a few managers might've looked at that and thought it was worth a go, with very little risk attached. He was more of a safe bet on paper than say, Kirk, McClelland or Sanders in terms of experience. It just hasn't worked out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Linky said:

Not sure about this. He was supposed to have great promise when he was at Rangers. Did really well on loan in the English League 2 and Scottish Championship and the thinking was that he lost his way a bit a Stirling, partly because he was without a club for 5 months before joining them.

I think quite a few managers might've looked at that and thought it was worth a go, with very little risk attached. He was more of a safe bet on paper than say, Kirk, McClelland or Sanders in terms of experience. It just hasn't worked out.

It hasn't worked out because he is rank rotten, we as a club cannot 'take a punt' on players and they just sit on the bench without having to do much for his salary,     Get rid along with the other dross.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, GMac said:

It hasn't worked out because he is rank rotten, we as a club cannot 'take a punt' on players and they just sit on the bench without having to do much for his salary,     Get rid along with the other dross.

Every club has to take a calculated risk on signing players. Some work and some don't. Some risks are expensive and don't work out, like Theo Bair, Ali Crawford or John Mahon. Some are cheap and do work out, like Kirk or Hendry. Nothing is a sure thing. If you don't risk signing a McPake, you don't risk signing a Hendry either.

I'm not hugely bothered that the club spent a small percentage of the wages bringing in a player for free who was young and had shown potential in the past. I'm more worried when we've blasted huge chunks of wages at aging players who add nothing to the squad, or large (for us) transfer fees at players who the management team don't really want to play, or know how to manage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The McPake signing made sense if it was alongside a better first choice winger, was a 1 year deal, and was cheap.

Ideally he'd have just played a very sparse role for a year, allowing Taylor Steven a loan, and in 12 months Steven would replace him and it would be an upgrade.

Instead we made McPake one of only two natural wide men in the entire team (Carey isn't anymore, for me), then didn't play a shape that even had wingers.

It was similar to Connor Smith. Levein signing someone who doesn't fit into how he plays but he couldn't not sign someone who showed potential once. It was like an addiction.

As for his performance v Rangers? He's played about 3 games in 3 months, will have zero confidence, and the performance had nosedived by the time he came on. He was never going to play well in those circumstances. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...