Mad World Posted August 1, 2012 Report Share Posted August 1, 2012 Dissapointed on 2 counts. Super Saint being banned is a poor, actually shocking decision. There are a lot of people on here who personally abuse constantly and quite frankly speak utter rubbish. Plus, Super Saint was the only one with any humour. The main reason i came on here. Secondly, to close a thread where this is being debated is even worse. I was at the match last Thursday and loved it. Thought it heralded a new dawn for Saints with encouraging new fans along. However, our only internet forum seems to be a closed shop for the select few. Very dissapointing. Usually just browse the forum but felt so strongly on this that i had to respond. I would suggest the moderator look at a number of people (wont name names), who only seem to personally abuse and like 95% of people on here have nothing to say whatsoever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Das Rave Posted August 1, 2012 Report Share Posted August 1, 2012 Got to disagree. While a minute amount of Super's posts were amusing, a lot were just nonsense, time wasting and clearly wind ups. He just went too far, if he'd stuck to the funnies it would have been okay, but a lot of it was just rubbish. I'm not advocating mass censorship but I think the time comes when enough is enough. And I agree about the mods needing to look at some folk who just abuse others, but I have no doubt the forum is in capable hands. I certainly don't have the time or ability to do it! I disagree with supporters of other teams coming on and systematically doling out stick. But until it becomes out and out abuse, surely its not a major issue. And the ability is there to report abusive posts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newyear'sday97 Posted August 1, 2012 Report Share Posted August 1, 2012 I would suggest the moderator look at a number of people (wont name names), who only seem to personally abuse and like 95% of people on here have nothing to say whatsoever. I'm confused - you're complaining about censorship but then imposing self-censorship? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SingaporeSaint Posted August 1, 2012 Report Share Posted August 1, 2012 Jamie will always have a thankless task and regardless of decisions, will also get critiscim. 99% of us know he does a great job. Obviously there was more to Super Saint than what we knew or he would still be with us. Soupey's online contributions were in the main harmless. I probably followed more than most of soupeys posts and only the thread on "lads dont cause trouble in turkey" did i find offensive and potentially damaging. mad world - though you of course you have an opinion but after only three posts - that alone will make people wonder your motives ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dev Posted August 1, 2012 Report Share Posted August 1, 2012 Thread closed due to thread originator being a wind-up merchant and reincarnation of previously banned poster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts