andrew

Members
  • Posts

    3,304
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    20

Posts posted by andrew

  1. 19 hours ago, garydavidson said:

    Any idea what the average age of the squad is these days? Tommy battled to get it down but I am fairly sure CD undid that quite quickly. 

    Tommy did a good job of getting the average age down before he left.

  2. 2 hours ago, Pat McGroin said:

    To be fair Random, I was also told (and I mentioned on here about it very early) that Macca and Eetu had had a massive bust up in training. I believe Dave is right on both points. I heard the same info. 
     

    Hendry was loaned out on both occasions because clubs came in offering to pay full whack for him and he wasn’t getting games. I was told the Chairman had basically said “well, you have enough already”

    If you believe that the Browns will ever fully step back, you’re easily led!! 
     

    I’m sure Geoff even still has a fair old input when he wants to.  

    It’s called micromanaging or penny pinching (not good things). SB may have stepped back from that level of oversight, but even that’s hard to step away from for those who have become accustomed to it.

    Whatever has been going on it has found its ultimate expression on the pitch, and that’s where the biggest let down of all has been. It’s almost criminal what we’ve witnessed this season, regardless of where it stemmed from.

  3. 8 hours ago, SaintJet said:

    Back tothe game. I wonder how we might approach this?

    There will be temptation on CD to line up with a 3 5 1 1,  ( Crawford or May playing just behind Hendry ) maybe bring back Brown into the line up and maybe Muzz help stifle Rangers going forward. It really is a double edged sword for us because if we take a free hit and line up looking to take the game to them we could end up getting a real hiding and the one bit of comfort we have is a better goal difference than Dundee. We have a pretty big sdquad so I can see changes but I honestly just don't know what way we will go. I think we all agree having Zander back would be a huge bonus.

    We will defend. We don’t do attack.

  4. We weren’t losing games by much, but latterly we were. The defence can’t cope with constant pressure due to a poor midfield and attack unable to hold the ball. All it took was one at the back to lose form or to start to make mistakes under the increased pressure. Not easily fixed without decent recruitment in the right areas and perhaps a change of style. All the stats and graphs make grim viewing. CD says we will be better. We shall see.

  5. 7 hours ago, mainstand said:

    I don't think it is a coincidence that the improvement in Zanders stats has come at a period when there has become question marks about the defence in front of him. During the period that he was conceding the higher percentage of shots, defenders were blocking everything that moved in front of him and closing down space so when they did get through on zander it was wither a pretty good shot or it was a move that got through our back line.  

    Mainstand suffering from confirmation bias? Won’t accept he was horrendous in 2020. Especially won’t accept that occasionally Random is right. We were calling him clownshoes game after game, epitomised by the goal he conceded at home to Motherwell. The turnaround hasn’t proved us wrong, simply that he went from so bad to the kind of performance that won us the match at Tananarive.

  6. My issue is the lack of transparency in and the withholding of government data. How many in hospital and icu solely because of covid? How many of those are vaccinated/unvaccinated? Selecting two health boards and publishing their data may be a politically motivated attempt to keep us guessing and keep us divided. Without accurate and true national figures answering my two questions I am unable to assess whether restrictions are proportionate or disproportionate. None of us can. As ever, the politicians are playing politics. I don’t trust them. And they’ve shut me out of football too.

  7. 54 minutes ago, blueheaven said:

    Sorry but I don't think this shows bias against us from referees. What I do think it shows is that our discipline is absolutely bloody shocking, and is something the manager desperately needs to get a grip of. There are certain players in our squad who are constantly mouthing off and picking up completely unnecessary bookings for dissent, and it really is not helping our cause at all.

    Let one complain and another next time. Better still, leave the captain to have a word. Many of our yellows and reds were easily avoided.

  8. 3 hours ago, McCarry One Nil said:

    A hard pick tbh but I gave my vote to Jamie McCart. He's had a poor'ish season so far by his standards but thought he was back to his best on Saturday, thought him & Liam snuffed almost everything out that came their way

    I’d need to see that backheel flicked clearance once more that he attempted that Celtic scored from before I can agree.

  9. 8 hours ago, Ali91 said:

    Admirable calling this nonsense out but just as a heads up the adjective you’re using to describe the guy is inappropriate. Article here discussing why. https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/inews.co.uk/news/uk/coloured-offensive-why-term-greg-clarke-fa-chairman-what-say-comments-resigned-756234/amp

     

    I was telling my daughter the other day about being raised in Perthshire in the 70’s. I did not see a black person, a gay person or a disabled person, apart from on tv, until I was in my 20’s in the 1980’s. Our parents provided for us in terms of food, clothes and a roof over our heads, but we were mostly left to get on with it. I can’t recall my parents ever asking me about my job or giving me advice or even having a discussion about what I was doing or intending to do. Times have changed massively and, for some, that may take a bit of getting used to, including appropriate and inappropriate use of language.