Carse of Gowrie Saint Posted April 22, 2012 Report Share Posted April 22, 2012 (edited) Sheffield United's £3M striker has just been sentenced to 5 years for rape. He'll be out in 2.5 years and still only 26. 90% (probably) of the clubs won't touch him but would you be happy if Saints signed him when he is released. Controversial but he's scored over 30 goals for Sheffield United this season. Edited April 22, 2012 by Carse of Gowrie Saint Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SingaporeSaint Posted April 22, 2012 Report Share Posted April 22, 2012 When you say 90%, where do you get this figure from. Very interested in how people compile statistics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carse of Gowrie Saint Posted April 22, 2012 Author Report Share Posted April 22, 2012 When you say 90%, where do you get this figure from. Very interested in how people compile statistics. Ok, I've changed it to 'probably' 90% Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint in exile Posted April 22, 2012 Report Share Posted April 22, 2012 Sheffield United's £3M striker has just been sentenced to 5 years for rape. He'll be out in 2.5 years and still only 26. 90% (probably) of the clubs won't touch him but would you be happy if Saints signed him when he is released. Controversial but he's scored over 30 goals for Sheffield United this season. Sick Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SingaporeSaint Posted April 22, 2012 Report Share Posted April 22, 2012 Ok, I've changed it to 'probably' 90% Best just to say nothing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ancientsaint Posted April 22, 2012 Report Share Posted April 22, 2012 Romanov will pair him with Craig Thomson. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slambrother Posted April 22, 2012 Report Share Posted April 22, 2012 Ridiculous thread and stupid hypothetical question, should really be deleted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SingaporeSaint Posted April 22, 2012 Report Share Posted April 22, 2012 Ridiculous thread and stupid hypothetical question, should really be deleted. Agreed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slf Posted April 22, 2012 Report Share Posted April 22, 2012 beast Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SingaporeSaint Posted April 23, 2012 Report Share Posted April 23, 2012 Beastie boys Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryangordon86 Posted April 23, 2012 Report Share Posted April 23, 2012 The whole thing is a bit unusual. How did the other boy get off? Why would a sober football player (or any sober person) want to sleep with someone in that state. Particularly a footballer because they're not likely to be short of offers from wannabe wags. I don't buy that the girl doesn't remember a thing either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kilgour Posted April 24, 2012 Report Share Posted April 24, 2012 English PFA haved now named him in their "Team of the Year" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryangordon86 Posted April 24, 2012 Report Share Posted April 24, 2012 I still don't get how both guys can admit to having sex with the girl yet one gets off scot free while the other gets 5 years for rape. Makes nae sense Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevensan Posted April 24, 2012 Report Share Posted April 24, 2012 my understanding is the she consented with the first guy, who then phoned Evans and told him to come over. Hence the first guy can show she consented, but Evans can't. The law is fairly clear that consent can not be given if they are unable due to drink or drugs, so regardless of the rights and many wrongs, he was stupid for putting him that position in the first place. The fact his mates were filming it through the window does tend to imply his motives were less than honest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slf Posted April 24, 2012 Report Share Posted April 24, 2012 my understanding is the she consented with the first guy, who then phoned Evans and told him to come over. Hence the first guy can show she consented, but Evans can't. The law is fairly clear that consent can not be given if they are unable due to drink or drugs, so regardless of the rights and many wrongs, he was stupid for putting him that position in the first place. The fact his mates were filming it through the window does tend to imply his motives were less than honest. ye sound like ye were there.were ye hiding in a cupboard, thats a singapore saint trick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SingaporeSaint Posted April 24, 2012 Report Share Posted April 24, 2012 ye sound like ye were there.were ye hiding in a cupboard, thats a singapore saint trick. slf, are you accusing me of being a serial rapist ???????? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevensan Posted April 24, 2012 Report Share Posted April 24, 2012 ye sound like ye were there.were ye hiding in a cupboard, thats a singapore saint trick. nope, i just read the court judgement instead Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.