OldPoster Posted June 25, 2007 Report Share Posted June 25, 2007 Who would you spend £16,000,000 on Thierry Henry or Darren Bent? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodgers Posted June 25, 2007 Report Share Posted June 25, 2007 Henry without any questions! id pay about 7mil for bent! Charlton are just making his price to high because they want to keep him and know some clubs ie chelsea might pay that kind of stupid of money for him! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
18SJHedgieFC84 Posted June 25, 2007 Report Share Posted June 25, 2007 Neither. No player should be rated at £16M! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Linky Posted June 25, 2007 Report Share Posted June 25, 2007 Why shouldn't a player be worth £16 million? Players are only worth what the market will pay for them. I know it's an obscene amount of money, but if that's what a club is willing to pay for someone then that is what they're worth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lethamsaintee Posted June 25, 2007 Report Share Posted June 25, 2007 henry every time, and thats coming from a spurs fan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy_Girl Posted June 25, 2007 Report Share Posted June 25, 2007 If I cant keep the money for myself, then it would have to be Henry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scobby_SJFC Posted June 25, 2007 Report Share Posted June 25, 2007 How the hell is Bent worth anywhere close to 16m? As somebody said previously who is worth 16 millions pounds, its shocking the money in football! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calinho Posted June 25, 2007 Report Share Posted June 25, 2007 To be honest, coming from an arsenal fan, i think we got the better end of the deal with £16 million for Henry, that can fund a decent replacement, say that cash plus Reyes who Atletico who are keen on him, for Torres who is 22 (i think?) and is a great talent to stick alongside Robin Van Persie whos also promising, Henry has been poor the last year with injurys catching up with him, i hope he can carry on playing top class football, but for now hes looking like hes reaching his peak and hes on the decline, as for Bent, hes gash Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barty1884 Posted June 26, 2007 Report Share Posted June 26, 2007 i've actually gone for darren bent...he's on the way up where as henry's career has stalled for the past couple of years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Super Trooper+ Posted June 26, 2007 Report Share Posted June 26, 2007 Henry, hands down Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-18-scotty-84- Posted June 30, 2007 Report Share Posted June 30, 2007 Haha, Barcelona have got away with daylight robbery here. £16 mil is ludicrous money to spend on a player but when you compare the money Chelsea have spent on Shevchenko and Drogba, Barcelona really have got a good deal here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cagey Posted July 1, 2007 Report Share Posted July 1, 2007 Someone is having a laugh. Bent is nowhere as good as Henry & 16 mil for him is just plain crazy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.