Sandaza


robinsaint

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 950
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Actually on 2nd thoughts, you should be fine with it being a facebook message. Had it came from his business email and had one of the 'this message is intended to be viewed by the recipient only etc'.. Then it would be different but I can't see you having any cause for concern when it's sent via social networking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ghostie...

What he said!

At no point did anybody say this was private. I made sure the guy knew I had NO official connection to the football club and at no time did I say I would not publish a response to my questions. I have done this through a social networking site and all I am doing is passing on the guys response. If anyone feels uncomfortable about this then please don't read it..

Hardly Wiki leaks is it:wink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually on 2nd thoughts, you should be fine with it being a facebook message. Had it came from his business email and had one of the 'this message is intended to be viewed by the recipient only etc'.. Then it would be different but I can't see you having any cause for concern when it's sent via social networking

Funily enough, I posted my reply before I read this.. Glad we seem in agreement. As for you HS, I feel I may have to put you back on ignore and suggest you do the same...

John, if any journos see this and lift it, that's there choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mr Jagger deserves everything he gets. He should have responded with something along the lines of 'My client's business is a private and confidential matter and I am not at liberty to disclose details for confidentiality reasons'

Instead he replied with the most tit-for-tat childlike response possible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mr Jagger deserves everything he gets. He should have responded with something along the lines of 'My client's business is a private and confidential matter and I am not at liberty to disclose details for confidentiality reasons'

Instead he replied with the most tit-for-tat childlike response possible

M Jagger does not sound to me as a person that fully understands cilent confidentaility

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mr Jagger deserves everything he gets. He should have responded with something along the lines of 'My client's business is a private and confidential matter and I am not at liberty to disclose details for confidentiality reasons'

Instead he replied with the most tit-for-tat childlike response possible

Spot on!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mr Jagger deserves everything he gets. He should have responded with something along the lines of 'My client's business is a private and confidential matter and I am not at liberty to disclose details for confidentiality reasons'

Instead he replied with the most tit-for-tat childlike response possible

I bring the bairn oot in everyone. Just ask HS:laugh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...