Edstar101 Posted September 11, 2012 Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 Unfortunately from a female CID that I know to much of her time is wasted by false claims by woman which knocks back the real victims.If as I believe that the whole case is thrown out then it's another set back and a reason why this should have been held back till tribunal findings. Unfortunately, that is all too true as well Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Juggernaut Posted September 11, 2012 Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 Opportunity doesn't come knocking every day, was more to emphasise that story was one sided and there is so much more than was put in print by the Record Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Juggernaut Posted September 11, 2012 Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 She's been front of house worker representing Saints to the public for 11 years. I'm sure if she was a stirrer/trouble maker it would have been dealt with before now. Which makes it more intriguing that she is the one no longer in post- oh there was no gardening leave (another record fabrication) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeilSJFC Posted September 11, 2012 Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 She has (alleged) played the footballer field before, many questions remain Out of interest, what has that got to do with anything? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Juggernaut Posted September 11, 2012 Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 Oops meant to add- jilted ,angry because of it. Was throwing out options and alternatives that's all NeilSJFC 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rik2304 Posted September 11, 2012 Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 Oops meant to add- jilted ,angry because of it. Was throwing out options and alternatives that's all How do you know all this Mr Juggernaut? About no gardening leave etc. I do not trust an X-Men Supervillian to tell the truth! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Juggernaut Posted September 11, 2012 Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 Remember I am Charles Xaviers brother and do end up on the good side Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ancientsaint Posted September 11, 2012 Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arJeEKP8TGY Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE LARK SAINT Posted September 11, 2012 Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 More to this than meets the eye,Lots of Questions to ask Why would the Club back the Manager if they thought it was true? Why is the Lassie no longer employed? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rik2304 Posted September 11, 2012 Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 Fair enough; STEP-brother though and possibly still not to be trusted! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Juggernaut Posted September 11, 2012 Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 Would it be different if it was in print? All I'm saying is remember the credentials of whe you read it and who wrote it, how I know isn't the real issue is it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rik2304 Posted September 11, 2012 Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 More to this than meets the eye,Lots of Questions to ask Why would the Club back the Manager if they thought it was true? Why is the Lassie no longer employed? And why has Stewart Hutton, who is a decent bloke, gone as well? Surely after the O'Boyle/Thomas business then employment law would be top of the agenda at McD? mgernih, cianofm, upuvilc and 1 other 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rik2304 Posted September 11, 2012 Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 But with all the Levenson stuff going on/Tommy Sheridan etc the red tops are behaving a bit better, being more careful these days are they not? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Juggernaut Posted September 11, 2012 Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 Not them all unfortunately Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliePullar Posted September 11, 2012 Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 And why has Stewart Hutton, who is a decent bloke, gone as well? Surely after the O'Boyle/Thomas business then employment law would be top of the agenda at McD? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barty1884 Posted September 11, 2012 Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 (edited) Certainly much more to this than meets the eye. No statement direct from the club either in support of the gaffer or a simple statement 'the club are investigating'. This has obviously been know for weeks internally and it seems really strange that she is no longer employed by the club - if she was put on 'home leave' then she should still be there until after the tribunal (if it ever gets that far) so I would assume she was none to pleased at the 'home leave' route she was being sent down and left of her own accord *assumption* and to be honest, if all this is true then I can't say I blame her at all. On the flip-side, if SL is denying then he needs to put out a statement in the VERY near future stating this. Keeping quiet isn't going to help in this case. On a side-note, surely you would put either just 'the accused' or both 'the accuser' and 'the accused' on gardening/home leave? Not simply to 'accuser' and leave the 'accused' to do a job? Edited September 11, 2012 by Barty1884 WilliePullar 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliePullar Posted September 11, 2012 Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 I thought Roddy was the new General Manager?? Weird how it's not on the site coz that's a good few weeks now..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Ziggy Stardust Posted September 11, 2012 Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 I thought Roddy was the new General Manager?? Weird how it's not on the site coz that's a good few weeks now..... Eh? Roddy was made an associate director. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Christmas Jones Posted September 11, 2012 Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 Certainly much more to this than meets the eye. No statement direct from the club either in support of the gaffer or a simple statement 'the club are investigating'. This has obviously been know for weeks internally and it seems really strange that she is no longer employed by the club - if she was put on 'home leave' then she should still be there until after the tribunal (if it ever gets that far) so I would assume she was none to pleased at the 'home leave' The club had an investigation and found Lomas had no case to answer and cannot make any statements whilst this is still going on.She was off with "stress" for a few months until she left. Every rumour that has been going about, is totally untrue and all the people with a bee in their bonnet will be left bitterly disappointed when the truth eventually comes out after the tribunal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Christmas Jones Posted September 11, 2012 Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 Eh? Roddy was made an associate director. Is that you re bird SZS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliePullar Posted September 11, 2012 Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 Eh? Roddy was made an associate director. That's correct, he was. Smart money on Roddy also being new general manager/chief exec/whatever the hell they'll call it this time. Tellin ye Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliePullar Posted September 11, 2012 Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 The club had an investigation and found Lomas had no case to answer and cannot make any statements whilst this is still going on.She was off with "stress" for a few months until she left. Every rumour that has been going about, is totally untrue and all the people with a bee in their bonnet will be left bitterly disappointed when the truth eventually comes out after the tribunal. If results don't see him out first pal!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Ziggy Stardust Posted September 11, 2012 Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 The club had an investigation and found Lomas had no case to answer and cannot make any statements whilst this is still going on.She was off with "stress" for a few months until she left. Every rumour that has been going about, is totally untrue and all the people with a bee in their bonnet will be left bitterly disappointed when the truth eventually comes out after the tribunal. The law will decide if Lomas has a case to answer, and you leave the lovely Mrs T out of all this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
perthandproud Posted September 11, 2012 Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 Come on the Juggernaut, you obviously have heard something from somebody on the SJFC side of things, would you care to expand why Stuart Hutton is no longer there, or is that too one sided for you to answer? I dont know the person involved however I do know part of what went on "allegedly" and to be honest your trying to paint a picture of the manager thats pretty hard to defend, Saints have dug themselves into a huge hole and slinging mud around aint gonna help them, I just hope for the boards sake they can defend their position once this is all over, we are meant to be a "family club" with family values, if this story is true, I'm not sure i would want my family anywhere near the place. More than likely this will be settled before it gets to court and a silence clause inserted which would be a shame as you know it will just make even more speculation and rumour abound. As an aside and nothing to do with the above, any sort of harassment either sexual, verbal or physical has no place in modern society and hopefully everyone agrees, its no laughing matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candalan Posted September 11, 2012 Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 The club had an investigation and found Lomas had no case to answer and cannot make any statements whilst this is still going on.She was off with "stress" for a few months until she left. Every rumour that has been going about, is totally untrue and all the people with a bee in their bonnet will be left bitterly disappointed when the truth eventually comes out after the tribunal. You 100% right about this? Plenty doubts circulating, she was at saints for over 10 years, why would she all of a sudden, make false accusations? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.